ChromeOS - On the road

I went on my first, out of country, trip with my ChromeOS netbook, over the weekend, and had a taste of how well ChomeOS does without Internet access. At home and on the road in my home country I'm always online, using WiFi or 3G, but outside Denmark using 3G is simply way to expensive, and I have to stick to WiFi whenever its available. First time without access was on the plane, but since I had not turned on offline mode for any of the Google apps, the netbook was simply unusable. I could have turned on offline mode in Google Docs and Google Calendar. Angry Birds should also work in offline mode. On the flight I could have watched a movie, but my tests earlier showed me that almost no video codec is supported, so any movie I would have liked to watch would have to be converted, even if I’m not 100% sure to what format. After connecting to a WiFi at my destination I activated offline mode on Google Docs and Calendar. I had some problems with Angry Birds, but I know that it works from earlier tests. In Google Docs you get the ability to view any document you have created earlier, but you cannot create a new document for later upload. It’s the same in Google Calendar. You can view all appointments, but not create new ones.

Being able to look up appointments and read though uploaded or earlier created documents is of course valuable, but the major reason for bringing a netbook on a trip is usually to create content of some kind. Google’s move to open up offline mode is a really good start, but for ChromeOS to take off they need to expand offline mode for their main apps. I’m not asking for the same usability as in online mode, I know that ChromeOS is a Cloud based system, but the ability to add content is essential. Writing a document, creating a spreadsheet, adding an appointment or replying to an email is actions you at a minimum would expect to be able to do even if you are not connected. Other things I would not mind seeing on ChromeOS in offline mode would include, reading up on Google+ and replying to posts, browsing pictures from Picasa and maybe even editing a little, watching cached videos from YouTube and planning my trip on Maps after downloading a map of my destination from home. There is lots more I would like to do, but these things are all things Google have the power to make come through, and I’m sure that there will be lots of other companies that will make their site available in offline mode for the Chrombooks out there also. On the media side Google have to include more video codec. I’m sure there will be improvements on this in the future, since playing videos is a very common thing to do on a netbook.

So have my offline experience turned me off ChromeOS? No I still use ChromeOS every day as my primary netbook OS. All the gains it gives me when connected outweigh the downsides of the current offline features. It does sober me up a bit on what is still needed for ChromeOS to be a true competitor to the super smartphones or the tablets out there. You do need a minimum of features even when your Cloud based OS is offline, and you need to be able to play movies, listen to music and view pictures in a easy to use interface and without having to do the converting game ahead of time.

Read my impressions of ChromeOS on a netbook here, http://chromebooknews.com/2011/06/19/chrome-os-on-aspire-one-a110-user-report/

How Google/Motorola could make the Atrix perfect

How the Atrix could look if running ChromeOS

Now Google owns Motorola Mobile Division, thoughts on that new and interesting products will emerge from the joint forces, can begin. One of the products I would really like to see is a updated version of the Motorola Atrix. The phone gone netbook idea really appeals to me and a couple of minor fixes to the existing platform could make it a real game changere.

The Atrix today uses the Firefox browser as the main feature of the Webtop system that starts every time the Atrix is docked. From what I understand from the reviews I have seen and read, it is also the Achilles' heel of the system. The promise of the full browser experience is not there and the system is slow. Google now have the change to chance that and at the same time make the perfect bridge between its to major OS’es. If they change the Webtop OS to ChromeOS, it will secure the full browser experience and make sure that the Atrix platform is 100% integrated into Google infrastructure. We have all ready seen ChromeOS running on Android hardware, ChromeOS on the Asus transformer, so the hardware and software is compatible. Actually I always wondered why Motorola decided on Firefox and not Chrome for the Atrix. If Google/Motorola at the same time upgraded the hardware so it included the latest quard core processor, the processing power should be there to make the entire experience like using one of the Chromebooks all ready in the marked.

A ChromeOS Atrix will address a lot of needs in the marked. Firstly it could easily be the benchmark Ice Cream Sandwich Android phone. Secondly it will be able to eat in to the netbook marked in a very price competitive way. The netbook dock is prices at around $200, a lot for at dock, but not if you get a Chromebook out of the investment. This setup could be very interesting for for the average consumer, but its one of the software developers for ChromeOS that will make this a killer product. Citrix launching its viewer for ChromeOS will open up a ChromeOS based Atrix to the businesses traveler and could very easily be all the hardware a company would have to give them. Since they will be working via a Citrix connection data is secure, even if the unit is lost.

So by changing 1 - 2 components in the existing Motorola Atrix, Google/Motorola could win over not just the consumer marked, but the business marked at the same time.


Update: I had a change to test the Atrix, read the test here (only available in Danish)

Den traditionelle PC er død - Smartphones, Tablets og Ultrabooks er fremtiden

Ultrabooks er fremtidens bærbare PC'er

Salget af PC'er i Danmark falder voldsomt lige nu. Så voldsomt at der nærmest er tale om en total opbremsning. Mere nøjagtigt drejer det sig om en tilbagegang på 40% over de sidste 12 måneder. En tilbagegang af den størrelse har aldrig tidligere fundet sted inden for PC'er. Hvad kan det skylde,s at vi her hjemme mere eller mindre er stoppet med at købe PC'er?

Det burde være nemt at pege på en af de vigtigste grunde til faldet. Salget af iPad, både version 1 og 2, her hjemme ligger i de samme 12 måneder på mellem 75.000 til 100.000 stk., hvis man skal tro rygterne. Det alene svare til knap 30% af det samlede salg af PC'er til private. Nu kan man jo ikke nødvendig konkludere at blot fordi der er blevet købt en iPad at det så automatisk betyder at der ikke bliver købt en PC. Der er på den anden side heller ikke tvivl om at mange har valgt at bruge penge på en iPad og samtidig valgt at udskyde købet af deres næste PC. Jeg tror nu ikke at beslutningen om at udskyde købet af en ny PC helt og holden skyldes købet af en iPad, der ligger mere bag.

Udviklingen af Windows og den måde vi bruger en PC på har betydet at selv mindre kraftige PC'er fortsat kan løse alle de opgaver en bruger har. Da Microsoft frigav Windows 7 faldt kravene til en Windows PC faktisk en del i forhold til kravene fra Windows Vista. Det betød at selv en netbook kunne få gælde af den nyeste version af Windows. Samtidig så har vi flyttet rigtigt mange opgaver ud i skyen. Mange bruger f.eks webmail enten fra Gmail eller Hotmail. Stortset alle bruger Facebook og flere og flere gemmer billeder på Flickr eller Picasa. Samtidig stiger hastigheden hvormed HTML5 baserede apps (avancerede programmer som kører i en browser) bliver tilgængelige, voldsomt lige nu.  Der findes efterhånden en HTML5 version af alle de kendte programmer til Windows. Dette blog indlæg skriver jeg f.eks. i Word, ikke den traditionelle version, men online web versionen. Der findes sågar en HTML5 version af det voldsomt populære spil Angry Birds. Hele denne bevægelse mod skyen betyder at kræfterne i den PC man bruger til at løse opgaverne på, ikke længere har den store betydning. Det er muligt at køre selv store kontorpakker på en lille netbook uden at det føles langsomt, noget der ikke tidligere har være muligt.

En anden udvikling som mange har vænnet sig til er, at den elektronik man bruger er klar til brug med det samme. Når man trykker på tænd på sin smartphone eller tablet så er den klar til brug uden behov for at skulle bruge 30 sek. til 1 minut for at starte op. Dette er noget Windows stadig lider under og selv om an blot sætter en Windows PC i dvale så tager det nemt 10 - 30 sek. før den igen er klar. På PC fronten har Apple og Google vist at det ikke behøver at være sådan. Både en MacBook Air og en Chromebook (en netbook baseret Googles ChromeOS) vender tilbage fra dvale på mellem 2 - 3 sek., altså lang tættere på en tablet eller smartphone. Faktisk er det så hurtigt at man har følelsen af at de er klar med det samme. Meget tyder på at dette har sat en ny standard for hvor hurtig den slags ting skal ske. Intel har da også lanceret et chipset som skal bruge til de helt nye Ultrabooks (Windows PC'er som har sammen minimale dimensioner som MacBook Air) og en af de funktioner som er bygget ind er meget kort boot og retur fra dvale tider.

Den traditionelle PC er altså ved at have udlevet sin eksistens berettigelse, og bliver nu angrebet fra to fronter. På den nemt tranportable front æder de store smartphones og tables sig ind på netbooks og de helt billige PC'er. I den lidt dyrere ende er det muligheden for lækkert design og for at starte hurtigt op, som sætter de PC'er, der satser på kraftig grafik og ekstra stor lager, til dørs. Der er altså meget der tyder på at de bærbare PC'er som vi har været vant til at købe ikke vil have lang tid igen.

Vi vil i stedet bruge vores smartphones eller tablets til de helt enkle opgaver som skal kunne løses uanset hvor vi er, og når der er brug for stor skærm og fuld tastatur, skal designet være i top og hastigheden hvormed man er i gang skal ligne en smartphones eller en tablet. Producenterne er ved at være klar med denne nye type bærbare. Acer, Lenovo og Toshiba har, på det netop startede IFA i Berlin, alle præsenteret deres bud på Ultrabook kategorien. De skal tage kampe op med Apples MacBook Air som allerede er på anden generation.

Viden om at disse PC'er er på vej og ønsket om at få fordel af deres nye muligheder, mener jeg er den vigtigste grund til at Apple er den eneste PC producent som har fremgang, og at så mange vælger at lade deres gamle PC holde et år eller to endnu.